;; UnionFind I ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; ;; In the last post, I showed Kruskal's algorithm for finding Extremal ;; Spanning Trees in a weighted graph. ;; If we were to try to scale that algorithm, we'd find that it was ;; quadratic in the number of vertices in the graph. ;; The problem is that we're repeatedly searching lists of sets to see ;; whether two things are connected or not ;; So we could speed it up a lot if we could find a data structure ;; that is good at that sort of thing ;; Specifically, we'd like to be able to ask whether a is joined to b quickly, ;; and we'd like to be able to quickly modify the relation when we decide to join a to b ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; ;; UnionFind is a data structure specifically designed for keeping ;; track of partitions and equivalence relations. ;; A partition is a division of a large set into smaller sets ;; It can also be viewed as an equivalence relation ;; a is joined to b, if and only if a and be are in the same subset in the partition. ;; Consider our set of cities (def cities ["London" "Birmingham" "Sheffield" "Bristol" "Leeds" "Liverpool" "Manchester"]) ;; We'll make that into a hash of cities, where each city points to itself (def initial (apply hashmap (mapcat (fn[x][x x]) cities))) ;; We'll interpret that map by saying 'All things that point to the same thing are in the same component'. ;; So in our initial map, where everything is pointing to itself, nothing is joined. ;; Say we want to assert that Liverpool ~ London. ;; Then we want to make everything that points to Liverpool point to whatever it is London points to. (defn join [unionfind [a b]] (let [leader1 (unionfind a) leader2 (unionfind b)] (into {} (map (fn[[k v]] (if (= v leader1) [k leader2] [k v])) unionfind)))) ;; Let's connect Liverpool to London and London to Bristol, and Manchester to Sheffield (reduce join initial [["Liverpool" "London"] ["London" "Bristol" ] ["Manchester" "Sheffield"]]) ;> {"Liverpool" "Bristol", "Sheffield" "Sheffield", "Manchester" "Sheffield", "Birmingham" "Birmingham", "Bristol" "Bristol", "London" "Bristol", "Leeds" "Leeds"} ;; Notice that Liverpool, Bristol, and London all point to Bristol (call that the Bristol Group) ;; And that Sheffield and Manchester form a group with Sheffield as its leader (call that the Sheffield group) ;; Whilst Leeds and Birmingham stand in splendid isolation, leaders of their own groups. ;; Now we can easily and quickly check which places are connected (defn joined? [unionfind a b] (= (unionfind a)(unionfind b))) (joined? (reduce join initial [["Liverpool" "London"] ["London" "Bristol" ] ["Manchester" "Sheffield"]]) "Bristol" "Liverpool") ;> true (joined? (reduce join initial [["Liverpool" "London"] ["London" "Bristol" ] ["Manchester" "Sheffield"]]) "Bristol" "Manchester") ;> false ;; But that's only half the problem. When joining cities, we still need to scan the whole map. ;; That means that if we're mainly joining things, rather than querying them, our performance is still poor. ;; So we should make each leader keep a list of the things that point to it. ;; Let's start again!
Blog Archive

▼
2013
(52)

▼
September
(12)
 Efficiency and Progress III : How Close Can We Get...
 Efficiency and Progress II : Behold, C
 Efficiency and Progress : My God, Clojure is Slow!
 How on earth do you program without *recursion*?
 Algorithms II
 Putting it all together : Using UnionFind in Krus...
 Implementing a Data Structure : UnionFind version II
 Implementing a Data Structure: UnionFind
 Kruskal's Algorithm for Minimal Spanning Trees
 The Knapsack Problem : Another Classic Puzzle from...
 Optimal Scheduling : A Classic Puzzle from Compute...
 SVG Graphics in a Clojure Web Application

▼
September
(12)
Thursday, September 19, 2013
Implementing a Data Structure: UnionFind
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment